Current:Home > NewsWisconsin Supreme Court sides with tenant advocates in limiting eviction records -TrueNorth Capital Hub
Wisconsin Supreme Court sides with tenant advocates in limiting eviction records
View
Date:2025-04-18 00:48:37
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin Supreme Court voted Monday in its first public administrative conference in more than a decade to reduce from 20 years to two years the time when most eviction records must be kept on the state court website.
The change was sought by tenant rights advocates who argued that the longer record-keeping has made it more difficult for people with lower incomes to find housing.
The court voted 4-3, with liberals in support and conservatives against, for shortening the record-keeping on the state court website, commonly referred to by the acronym CCAP.
Legal Action of Wisconsin sought the change for cases where there is no money judgment against a tenant. At a hearing last month, tenant advocates said the change would help renters with eviction histories, since many landlords rely solely on the statewide court website for determining whether to rent to someone.
Justice Brian Hagedorn dissented. He questioned closing off public access to the records, which he also said would pose an administrative burden for court officials. He said there were other ways to address concerns raised by tenant advocates.
“It just feels odd to me this court would get into it this way by shutting down access to records,” Hagedorn said Monday. “That’s a significant thing.”
Numerous landlord groups, including the Wisconsin Realtors Association, opposed the proposal. They argued that changing the rule could result in landlords charging higher rental deposits tAo protect themselves, a change that will negatively affect all renters.
Last year in Wisconsin, there were 25,819 filings for eviction with 1,621 resulting in judgment of evictions being granted, according to Wisconsin’s Department of Administration.
Justices voted to make the change in an open conference, something they haven’t held since 2012. The court’s new liberal majority changed operating procedures to again open the meetings that conservative justices closed in 2012 when they were in the majority.
The conference came just three days after the court voted 4-3, again along partisan lines, to accept a case seeking to overturn Republican-drawn legislative maps. Newly elected liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz decided against recusing in that case, despite threats from Republican lawmakers to impeach her if she hears it.
Protasiewicz participated in Monday’s administrative conference.
veryGood! (37)
Related
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- How Shakira Started Feeling Enough Again After Gerard Piqué Breakup
- Cate Blanchett Revives 2014 Armani Privé Dress With Daring Twist for 2023 SAG Awards
- Where's the song of the summer? Plus, the making of Beyoncé's 'Crazy in Love'
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- A 'Barbie' v. 'Oppenheimer' Game
- Troian Bellisario Had Childhood Crush on This Hocus Pocus Star—Before They Became Stepsiblings
- 17 Cute & Affordable Amazon Dresses You Can Dress Up & Down for Spring
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Buckle up: This mile-a-minute 'Joy Ride' across China is a raunchy romp
Ranking
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- China says U.S.-U.K.-Australia nuclear submarine deal puts allies on path of error and danger
- Oye como va: New York is getting a museum dedicated to salsa music
- Transcript: Rep. Michael McCaul on Face the Nation, March 12, 2023
- Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
- Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes Gives Birth to Baby No. 2 Ahead of Prison Sentence
- U.S. to extend legal stay of Ukrainian refugees processed along Mexican border
- Summer House's Paige DeSorbo and Hannah Berner Love This $5 Mascara With 220,800+ 5-Star Reviews
Recommendation
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
Matthew McConaughey’s Look-Alike Sons Are All Grown Up In Rare Picture
How Survivor Winners Have Spent, Saved or Wasted Their $1 Million Prize
From Barbie's origin story to the power of quitting, give these new podcasts a listen
Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
RuPaul's Drag Race Queens Tell What 200th Episode Means for the LGBTQ Community
Tom Sizemore’s Family Is Deciding End of Life Matters After Brain Aneurysm and Stroke
Why TikTok's Controversial Bold Glamour Filter Is More Than Meets the Eye